Skip to main content
Category

Real Estate Litigation

Preventing Adverse Possession – What Every California Property Owner Needs to Know

August 16, 2024 | By

If you own property in Los Angeles or anywhere else in California, it’s crucial to be aware of adverse possession. This legal concept can potentially allow a trespasser to claim ownership of your property if specific legal requirements are met. Understanding how adverse possession works and how to prevent it is essential for safeguarding your real estate assets.

What is Adverse Possession?

Adverse possession is a legal doctrine that permits a trespasser to potentially gain legal ownership of another person’s property. Under California law, this concept is governed by a combination of statutes and case law. The primary statute governing adverse possession in California is found in the California Code of Civil Procedure Sections 318, 319, 321, and 325. These statutes outline the legal requirements that must be met for …

Continue reading →

Posted In: Blog, Quiet Title Actions, Real Estate Litigation

Resulting Trusts In California

August 12, 2024 | By

Trusts are created by property owners to protect certain assets, privately transfer wealth, and reduce taxes.  However, trusts can fail and not operate as intended. In these situations, a probate judge could invoke a “resulting trust” as an equitable remedy to properly transfer the property, carry out the terms of the trust agreement, and protect the positions of the beneficiaries.

When trusts fail and assets need reassignment, the Vokshori Law Group’s experienced real estate litigation attorneys step in. They handle such cases to ensure a fair resolution and the proper reassignment of assets.

The Resulting Trust Remedy

There are three common reasons for a trust to fail:

  • the property owner did not fully fund the trust,
  • the owner did not update the trust as situations changed, or
  • the beneficiaries cannot
Continue reading →

Posted In: Blog, Quiet Title Actions, Real Estate Litigation

If Walls Could Talk: Understanding the Duty to Disclose in California Real Estate

July 15, 2024 | By

In the landmark case of Reed v. King (1983), the California Court of Appeal tackled the issue of whether a seller must disclose that a house was the site of a multiple murder. Dorris Reed purchased a house from Robert King, who, along with his real estate agents, failed to inform her that a woman and her four children had been murdered there ten years prior. Reed only learned about the murders from a neighbor after the purchase. She sued for rescission and damages, claiming the non-disclosure affected the property’s market value and desirability.

The court reversed the initial judgment, which had dismissed Reed’s complaint. It emphasized that sellers must disclose facts materially affecting the value or desirability of the property, especially if such facts are not readily observable by …

Continue reading →

Posted In: Blog, Failure to Disclose, Real Estate Litigation

Hidden Hazards: The Thomases’ Battle with Unpermitted Structures and Past Violations.

July 12, 2024 | By

Imagine purchasing your dream property only to be blindsided by fines and legal battles over issues you didn’t create. This is the reality for the Thomases in Humboldt County, California. After buying a property unknowingly used for illegal cannabis cultivation by previous owners, they now face at least $1 million in fines due to an unpermitted structure. This case underscores the critical importance of thorough property investigations before buying, as hidden violations can lead to significant financial and legal consequences for new homeowners.

Background

In 2019, Humboldt County’s code enforcement department raided the property in Miranda, an unincorporated community, and shut down an illegal cannabis operation. The then-owners were cited for unlicensed cultivation and having an unpermitted structure, leading to an administrative penalty of $12,000 over 90 days.

Six days …

Continue reading →

Posted In: Blog, Failure to Disclose, Real Estate Litigation

Court Strikes Down Excessive Default Interest Penalties: What Borrowers Need to Know

July 8, 2024 | By

In a landmark decision that has significant implications for borrowers, the California Court of Appeal in Honchariw v. FJM Private Mortgage Fund, LLC ruled that excessive default interest and late fees in non-consumer loans can be deemed unenforceable penalties. This ruling serves as a critical reminder for borrowers to be vigilant about the terms of their loan agreements and offers a pathway to challenge unfair penalty provisions.

Case Background

Nicholas and Sharon Honchariw borrowed $5.6 million from FJM Private Mortgage Fund, LLC, secured by commercial real estate. Their loan agreement included an interest rate of 8.5% per annum, a 10% late fee on missed payments, and a default interest rate that increased to 18.49% upon any default. When the Honchariws missed a payment of $39,667 on September 1, 2019, these …

Continue reading →

Posted In: Blog, Mortgage Litigation, Real Estate Litigation

Buyer Beware: Court Upholds Broker’s Commission Claim in Real Estate Dispute

July 1, 2024 | By
Court Upholds Broker's Commission Claim in Real Estate Dispute

In Chan v. Tsang, the California Court of Appeal examined whether a buyer’s broker can recover a commission from a buyer who unjustifiably refuses to complete a real estate transaction. The court determined that the buyer was responsible for paying the broker $100,000, the commission that would have been earned from the seller if the buyer had fulfilled the purchase agreement.

Tsang (the Buyer) expressed interest to Chan (the Broker) in purchasing commercial property. The Broker introduced the Buyer to a property owned by Mountain View Center Associates (the Seller). The Seller accepted the Buyer’s offer of $4 million, with the Broker’s commission set at $100,000.

However, the Buyer later backed out of the deal without any valid reason. This led to lawsuits between the Seller, the …

Continue reading →

Posted In: Blog, Broker/Agent Liability, Real Estate Litigation

Understanding Seller Financing: Key Questions and Legal Considerations

June 22, 2024 | By
Understanding Seller Financing: Key Questions and Legal Considerations

Seller financing, also known as a seller “carry back,” is when a property seller extends credit to a buyer to assist with the purchase. This approach can simplify transactions but requires compliance with various state and federal regulations. Here’s an overview of crucial points and common questions regarding seller financing.

Key Questions to Consider in Seller Financing

  1. Specific Disclosures:

    • California law mandates specific disclosures for certain seller financing transactions. For instance, the Seller Financing Addendum and Disclosure (C.A.R. form SFA) is necessary for 1-4 unit residential properties when an arranger of credit is involved.
  2. Arranger of Credit:

    • Typically, the buyer’s real estate agent acts as the arranger of credit. This role can be played by anyone who is not a party to the sale and who is involved
Continue reading →

Posted In: Blog, Real Estate Litigation

Understanding Partition Actions in California: A Guide for Co-Tenants

May 30, 2024 | By

In California, partition actions are a common legal remedy for co-owners who want to end their shared ownership of a property. This process can lead to either the sale of the property and division of the proceeds, or the physical division of the property into separate parcels.

This article will guide you through what a partition action entails, especially focusing on how co-owners can manage improvements and repairs to the property. We’ll delve into the rights and responsibilities of co-tenants, how to claim reimbursement for property enhancements, and the intricacies of handling these situations in court.

The Partition Action

In California, a partition action is a civil procedure used by a co-owner to end joint ownership of a property. This can result in either the sale of the property and …

Continue reading →

Posted In: Blog, Partition Actions, Real Estate Litigation

Common Liens and Judgments

May 23, 2024 | By

Property liens are legal claims that are placed on a piece of real estate (Real Property). They are usually the result of debts that the property owner owes. For example, if a homeowner fails to pay their property tax, the government can put a tax lien on the homeowner’s property.

When a property has a lien,  it means that there is a barrier to selling the property.

The homeowner cannot sell their home unless the lien is removed. In some cases, property liens can even lead to foreclosure. For instance, if a homeowner fails to pay their mortgage, the lender can take possession of the house and sell it to pay off the debt.

There are different types of property liens. They can be either general or specific, and voluntary

Continue reading →

Posted In: Blog, Foreclosure Defense, Real Estate Litigation

Quiet Title Actions Explained

May 20, 2024 | By

The purpose of a quiet title action is to establish title against adverse claims to real property or any interest in the property. [Code Civ. Proc. §760.020] The remedy of quiet title can be combined with other causes of action or other remedies. In an action or proceeding in which establishing or quieting title to property is in issue, the court may, in its discretion and on the motion of any party, require that the issue be resolved pursuant to the Code Civ. Proc. provisions relating to quiet title actions. [Code Civ. Proc. §760.030]

Jurisdiction

A quiet title action must be brought in the superior court of the county in which the real property is located. Once the action is before the court, the court has complete power to determine …

Continue reading →

Posted In: Blog, Quiet Title Actions, Real Estate Litigation