Skip to main content
Monthly Archives

May 2024

Understanding Partition Actions in California: A Guide for Co-Tenants

May 30, 2024 | By

In California, partition actions are a common legal remedy for co-owners who want to end their shared ownership of a property. This process can lead to either the sale of the property and division of the proceeds, or the physical division of the property into separate parcels.

This article will guide you through what a partition action entails, especially focusing on how co-owners can manage improvements and repairs to the property. We’ll delve into the rights and responsibilities of co-tenants, how to claim reimbursement for property enhancements, and the intricacies of handling these situations in court.

The Partition Action

In California, a partition action is a civil procedure used by a co-owner to end joint ownership of a property. This can result in either the sale of the property and …

Continue reading →

Posted In: Blog, Partition Actions, Real Estate Litigation

Common Liens and Judgments

May 23, 2024 | By

Property liens are legal claims that are placed on a piece of real estate (Real Property). They are usually the result of debts that the property owner owes. For example, if a homeowner fails to pay their property tax, the government can put a tax lien on the homeowner’s property.

When a property has a lien,  it means that there is a barrier to selling the property.

The homeowner cannot sell their home unless the lien is removed. In some cases, property liens can even lead to foreclosure. For instance, if a homeowner fails to pay their mortgage, the lender can take possession of the house and sell it to pay off the debt.

There are different types of property liens. They can be either general or specific, and voluntary …

Continue reading →

Posted In: Blog, Foreclosure, Real Estate Litigation

Understanding Foreclosure: A HANDY REFERENCE GUIDE

May 21, 2024 | By

What is Foreclosure?

When a homeowner fails to make the payments due on their home loan, the mortgage company can ‘foreclose’. This means that the lender can force a sale of the home to pay for the outstanding balance of the loan.

Timeline of a Foreclosure

Day 1 You are in default two days after your payment is due.
Day 32 You have now missed two monthly payments.
 

Day 32-90

 Sometime during this period you will receive a letter stating that the Notice of Default (NOD) has been recorded. The speed with which lenders send NOD depends on the policy of each individual lender.
 

NOD Recorded

 From this day, the next 90 days is a silent period. You have this time to pay all back payments, fees, and other charges
…
Continue reading →

Posted In: Blog, Foreclosure, Real Estate Litigation

Quiet Title Actions Explained

May 20, 2024 | By

The purpose of a quiet title action is to establish title against adverse claims to real property or any interest in the property. [Code Civ. Proc. §760.020] The remedy of quiet title can be combined with other causes of action or other remedies. In an action or proceeding in which establishing or quieting title to property is in issue, the court may, in its discretion and on the motion of any party, require that the issue be resolved pursuant to the Code Civ. Proc. provisions relating to quiet title actions. [Code Civ. Proc. §760.030]

Jurisdiction

A quiet title action must be brought in the superior court of the county in which the real property is located. Once the action is before the court, the court has complete power to determine …

Continue reading →

Posted In: Blog, Quiet Title Actions, Real Estate Litigation

Equitable Easements in California: Insights from Romero v. Shih

May 17, 2024 | By

In the notable case of Romero v. Shih, the California Court of Appeal dealt with a failed lot line adjustment and its transformation into an equitable easement, providing a significant learning point for legal professionals, especially those in real estate and property law.

Background of the Case

The case revolved around two adjacent residential lots that had been under the same ownership since 1941. An attempt was made to adjust the lot lines to prevent practical issues with a driveway on the narrower lot. Despite initiating the process, including obtaining a zoning variance and preparing a new map, the adjustment was never formally recorded. This oversight led to subsequent ownership disputes when the lots were sold, using the original legal descriptions, and new owners found discrepancies in the lot …

Continue reading →

Posted In: Blog, Easement and Encroachment Actions, Real Estate Litigation

Are you ready to work with
a different kind of law firm?

If you need legal assistance, don’t hesitate to contact us today.
We are here to help you achieve a successful outcome
and protect your rights every step of the way.

FREE CONSULTATION
(855) 855-2608